Local-only learningOfficial-source trailReviewed 30 Aug 2026

SCENARIO D02 · GOVERNANCE & TRANSFERS

A designated SDF deploys algorithmic software without a rights-risk review. What does future Rule 13 say?

IN PLAIN ENGLISH

Why you are seeing this step

This field note uses one realistic decision to separate the official source, an editorial interpretation, a practical option, evidence to keep, and any uncertainty that still depends on your facts.

Educational only, not legal advice. Source status is dated 13 May 2027; inspect the official links below before relying on it.

BEST NEXT STEP

Exercise due diligence that the technical measures are not likely to pose a risk to Data Principals’ rights.

For a designated SDF, make the due-diligence record specific to the technical measure and risks to rights.

WHY THE OTHER INSTINCTS MISS

Best answer

Exercise due diligence that the technical measures are not likely to pose a risk to Data Principals’ rights.

Correct. That closely follows Rule 13(3) without inventing a guaranteed-safety certification.

Option 2

Obtain government approval for every algorithm before use.

Rule 13(3) does not state that universal approval mechanism.

Option 3

Review only models that make fully automated decisions.

Rule 13(3) describes algorithmic software across several processing operations and is not limited to that narrower label.

BUILD THIS EVIDENCE

Algorithm register, rights-risk assessment, test results, mitigations and approval record.

This artefact supports review. It does not certify compliance or replace advice on your facts.

Guidance type
legal requirement
Pinpoint
Rule 13(3); G.S.R. 846(E)
Reviewed
2026-08-30
Change note
Status and pinpoint reviewed against the official Act, final Rules, commencement notification and corrigendum for this educational website.

OFFICIAL SOURCE TRAIL