Local-only learningOfficial-source trailReviewed 30 Aug 2026

SCENARIO M04 · RETENTION & ERASURE

A service keeps logs containing personal data but has no retention period. Which future Rules need checking?

IN PLAIN ENGLISH

Why you are seeing this step

This field note uses one realistic decision to separate the official source, an editorial interpretation, a practical option, evidence to keep, and any uncertainty that still depends on your facts.

Educational only, not legal advice. Source status is dated 13 May 2027; inspect the official links below before relying on it.

BEST NEXT STEP

Rule 6(1)(e) security logs and Rule 8(3)/Seventh Schedule processing records, plus any other law.

Classify the log and its purpose before assigning a period. Do not turn one schedule into a universal retention rule.

WHY THE OTHER INSTINCTS MISS

Best answer

Rule 6(1)(e) security logs and Rule 8(3)/Seventh Schedule processing records, plus any other law.

Correct. Both future provisions use a one-year period in their stated contexts, with room for other-law requirements.

Option 2

A universal seven-year period for every log.

The seven-year record rule in the First Schedule concerns a Consent Manager’s specified platform records, not every log.

Option 3

Immediate deletion of every log after an incident closes.

That can conflict with the future minimum periods and other applicable law.

BUILD THIS EVIDENCE

Log taxonomy, applicable Rule/other-law basis, one-year trigger where relevant and deletion job evidence.

This artefact supports review. It does not certify compliance or replace advice on your facts.

Guidance type
legal requirement
Pinpoint
Rules 6(1)(e), 8(3) and Seventh Schedule; G.S.R. 846(E)
Reviewed
2026-08-30
Change note
Status and pinpoint reviewed against the official Act, final Rules, commencement notification and corrigendum for this educational website.

OFFICIAL SOURCE TRAIL